Software Validation Deliverables: A Comprehensive Guide

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


Validation deliverables are crucial in software development. Prioritizing product quality and functionality is paramount, and validation plays a pivotal role in achieving this. Validation deliverables produce tangible results essential for building robust and reliable software solutions. In this informative article, we will delve into the significance of validation deliverables and how they aid in developing top-notch software solutions.

What are Validation Deliverables?

In software development, “validation deliverables” refer to the tangible outputs, artifacts, or documentation that demonstrate that a software system or component meets its intended requirements and functions correctly.

These deliverables are essential to ensure the quality, reliability, and functionality of the software being developed. Validation is a crucial part of the software development life cycle (SDLC) and involves confirming that the software meets the user’s needs and operates as expected.

image 6
Software validation methods: Photo Credit –
  • #Test Cases and Test Scripts: These documents outline the specific scenarios, inputs, and expected outputs for testing the software. They serve as a roadmap for conducting various tests to validate the system’s functionality. Here’s an example of test cases and test scripts for a simple login functionality of a web application:

Test Case 1: Verify Successful Login

  • Description: This test case verifies that a user can successfully log in to the web application.
  • Test Steps:
    1. Launch the web application.
    2. Enter a valid username (“user123”) and password (“password123”).
    3. Click the “Login” button.
  • Expected Result: The user should be successfully logged in and directed to the dashboard page.
test script
Test Script Example for Test Case 1: Verify Successful Login

Test Case 2: Verify Invalid Login Attempt

  • Description: This test case checks the behavior when an invalid login attempt is made.
  • Test Steps:
    1. Launch the web application.
    2. Enter an invalid username (“invaliduser”) and password (“invalidpass”).
    3. Click the “Login” button.
  • Expected Result: The system should display an error message indicating that the login credentials are incorrect.
image 5
Test Script Example for Test Case 2: Verify Invalid Login Attempt

Test Case 3: Verify Forgot Password Functionality

  • Description: This test case validates the “Forgot Password” feature.
  • Test Steps:
    1. Launch the web application.
    2. Click on the “Forgot Password” link.
    3. Enter the registered email address.
    4. Click the “Submit” button.
  • Expected Result: The user should receive a password reset email containing instructions to reset the password.

These test cases and scripts provide a structured approach to testing the login functionality of the web application. Similar test cases and scripts can be created for other features and functionalities of the application to ensure thorough testing and validation.

  • #Test Results and Reports: After conducting tests, the results and associated reports provide a clear picture of whether the software has passed or failed each test case. These reports offer valuable insights into the software’s strengths and weaknesses, enabling stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding its readiness for deployment.
  • #User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Results: UAT is a critical phase where end-users validate the software’s suitability for their needs. The UAT results and feedback provide a user-centric perspective on the software’s performance and help bridge the gap between developers and users, ensuring that the final product aligns with user expectations.
  • Read another article- Why is important to fix keyword cannibalization at

User Acceptance Testing (UAT) is a crucial phase in the software development lifecycle where the software is tested by actual users to ensure it meets their needs and expectations. UAT results and feedback provide a user-centric perspective on software performance.

Here’s how:-

  1. Real-World Validation: UAT involves real users interacting with the software in a realistic environment. Their actions mimic actual usage scenarios, which provides valuable insights into how the software performs in real-world situations.
  2. User Experience Evaluation: UAT allows users to evaluate the software’s user interface, ease of use, and overall user experience. Feedback from users about the interface’s intuitiveness, navigation, and design provides a direct measure of user satisfaction.
  3. Functional Suitability: Users verify if the software’s functionalities align with their requirements and expectations. They identify any discrepancies between the software’s behavior and their needs, ensuring that the software performs its intended functions correctly.
  4. Error Identification: Users are often quick to identify errors, glitches, or inconsistencies that might have been missed during earlier testing phases. UAT helps uncover any issues that hinder the software’s performance or impede its usability.
  5. Performance Assessment: Users provide insights into the software’s performance in terms of speed, responsiveness, and scalability. They can highlight areas where the software might lag or perform suboptimally under certain conditions.
  6. Business Logic Alignment: Users ensure that the software aligns with their specific business processes and workflows. Any deviations from their expectations can be identified and rectified during UAT.
  7. Scenario Testing: Users validate the software across various scenarios that mirror their day-to-day tasks. This ensures that the software is not only technically sound but also practical and efficient in supporting their workflows.
  8. Genuine Feedback: Users provide authentic feedback based on their personal experiences and needs. This feedback is invaluable in refining the software to cater directly to user preferences.
  9. User-Driven Improvements: UAT feedback often leads to improvements that might not have been considered during the development process. This user-driven approach enhances the software’s overall quality and usability.
  10. User Satisfaction: The primary goal of UAT is to ensure user satisfaction. Positive feedback during UAT indicates that the software meets users’ expectations and requirements, while negative feedback highlights areas that need improvement.
  • #Validation Plans: A validation plan outlines the strategies, methodologies, and resources to be used for validating the software. It serves as a roadmap for the entire validation process. For example, the plan should include a description of the validation approach, tools and techniques to be used, the validation environment, and the resources required to ensure the validation process is successful.
  • #Traceability Matrices: These matrices demonstrate how each requirement maps to specific tests and test results, ensuring that all requirements have been adequately tested and validated. This helps to ensure that all requirements have been tested and validated to an acceptable level of accuracy and that any changes or modifications to the requirements are tracked and documented in the matrix.

This allows for greater transparency and accountability in the testing process. For example, a traceability matrix can be used to track how each user requirement maps to the tests performed on the system, and the results of those tests.

The Traceability Matrix Tool for Software Validation Deliverables

Test Management Tools:

  • HP ALM (Application Lifecycle Management): This comprehensive test management tool offers features for creating and managing traceability matrices. It allows you to link requirements, test cases, and defects, ensuring that all validation activities are tracked.
  • Zephyr: This test management solution provides traceability capabilities that help you establish and maintain the connection between requirements, test cases, and validation outcomes.
  1. Requirements Management Tools:
    • IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS: A powerful tool designed for managing complex requirements and their relationships. It can be used to create traceability matrices that connect requirements with validation activities.
    • Polarion Requirements: This tool offers requirements management and traceability capabilities, allowing you to track validation efforts and their alignment with requirements.
  2. Quality Management Systems:
    • MasterControl: A quality management system that includes features for managing compliance and validation. It allows you to create and maintain traceability matrices to ensure that validation deliverables meet regulatory requirements.
    • Sparta Systems TrackWise: This system provides solutions for quality and compliance management, and it can be utilized to manage traceability matrices for software validation.
  3. Custom-built Solutions:
    • Some organizations develop their own custom tools or templates for managing traceability matrices. These solutions can be tailored to specific validation processes and requirements.
  4. Document Management Systems:
    • Tools like Microsoft SharePoint or Documentum can be used to manage traceability matrices as part of validation documentation. They offer document versioning, collaboration features, and access controls.
  5. Spreadsheet Software:
    • While not as specialized, tools like Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets can be used to create and manage basic traceability matrices for smaller-scale validation projects.

When selecting a tool for managing traceability matrices in software validation deliverables, consider factors such as regulatory compliance, integration capabilities with other systems, ease of use, reporting features, and the scalability of the tool for your organization’s needs. The tool you choose should effectively facilitate the tracking and documentation of validation activities and their alignment with requirements.

  • #Validation Protocols: These documents detail the procedures for performing validation activities, including the steps to be taken, the expected outcomes, and the criteria for success. The protocols also provide guidance on the types of tests to be conducted, the resources required, and the personnel responsible for the validation activities. They are essential for ensuring that each validation process is performed correctly and consistently.
Key Component of validation protocol

Key components of validation protocols :

  1. Objective and Scope: Clearly defines the purpose and scope of the validation activities, including the product, system, equipment, or process being validated.
  2. Equipment and Software Requirements: Lists the specific equipment, instruments, tools, and software needed to perform the validation tests.
  3. Pre-validation Preparations: Details the necessary steps to prepare the equipment or system for validation, which may include installation, configuration, calibration, and ensuring that all prerequisites are met.
  4. Validation Procedures: Provides step-by-step instructions for executing each validation test or activity. This section includes specific details on how to perform tests, measurements, simulations, and other activities relevant to the validation process.
  5. Test Cases and Test Scenarios: Outlines the specific test cases and scenarios that will be executed during validation. These may include functional testing, performance testing, integration testing, and more.
  6. Data Collection and Analysis: Describes how data will be collected during the validation process and how the collected data will be analyzed to determine whether the product or process meets the acceptance criteria.
  7. Acceptance Criteria Verification: Specifies the criteria that must be met for each validation test to be considered successful. These criteria are typically based on established standards, regulations, and the intended purpose of the product or process.
  8. Reporting and Documentation: Explains how test results, deviations, and exceptions will be documented, recorded, and reported. This includes creating detailed reports that outline the outcomes of each test.
  9. Post-validation Activities: Covers actions to be taken after the validation activities are completed, such as archiving validation documents, obtaining approvals, and ensuring that all necessary sign-offs are obtained.
  • #Compliance Documents: In regulated industries, the software may need to comply with specific standards or regulations. Validation deliverables in such cases include documents that demonstrate compliance with these requirements.

Here are some common types of compliance documents:

  1. Policies and Procedures:
    • Compliance Policies: These documents outline the organization’s commitment to compliance and the overarching principles that guide compliance efforts.
    • Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): Detailed instructions on how specific tasks and processes should be carried out to ensure compliance.
  2. Regulatory Filings:
    • Regulatory Submissions: Documents submitted to regulatory authorities to request approvals, licenses, permits, or to report certain activities.
    • Public Disclosures: Documents shared with the public, stakeholders, or regulatory bodies to provide information about the organization’s compliance efforts.
  3. Risk Assessments and Management:
    • Risk Assessments: Documents that identify potential risks and evaluate their impact on compliance and business operations.
    • Risk Management Plans: Outlines strategies for mitigating and managing identified risks to ensure compliance.
  4. Audit and Inspection Documents:
    • Audit Reports: Documents summarizing the findings of internal or external audits of compliance practices.
    • Inspection Reports: Reports generated by regulatory agencies after inspecting an organization’s compliance with regulations.
  5. Training and Certification:
    • Training Materials: Documents used to educate employees on compliance policies, procedures, and regulations.
    • Certifications: Documents proving that employees have completed compliance training or have met specific requirements.
  6. Incident Reports and Investigations:
    • Incident Reports: Documents detailing any compliance-related incidents or breaches and the actions taken to address them.
    • Investigation Reports: Documents outlining the findings of investigations into compliance violations or concerns.
  7. Quality Assurance Documents:
    • Validation Protocols: Documents detailing procedures for ensuring that systems, processes, or products meet defined quality and compliance standards.
    • Change Control Documents: Documents outlining the process for implementing changes while maintaining compliance.
  8. Environmental and Safety Documents:
    • Environmental Impact Assessments: Documents evaluating the potential environmental effects of a project or operation.
    • Safety Plans: Documents outlining safety measures and procedures to ensure compliance with safety regulations.
  9. Data Privacy and Security Documents:
    • Privacy Policies: Documents that outline how an organization collects, uses, and protects personal data.
    • Security Plans: Documents detailing measures to safeguard sensitive information and ensure compliance with data protection laws.
  10. Code of Conduct and Ethics Documents:
    • Code of Conduct: Documents that establish ethical guidelines and standards of behavior for employees and stakeholders.
    • Ethics Policies: Documents outlining the organization’s commitment to ethical practices and decision-making.

These are just a few examples of the types of compliance documents that organizations may need to create and maintain to ensure adherence to regulations and standards. The specific types of compliance documents required will depend on the industry, jurisdiction, and nature of the organization’s operations.

  • #Bug Reports and Issue Logs: Any issues, defects, or bugs discovered during validation are documented, and their resolution is tracked to ensure the software’s quality.
Bug reports
Bug reports provide detailed information about the problem, making it easier for development and validation teams to understand, replicate, and address the issue.
  • #Sign-Offs and Approvals: Validation often requires sign-off or approval from relevant stakeholders, indicating that the software has undergone adequate testing and meets the required standards.

How validation deliverables are crucial in software companies?

Validation deliverables are crucial in software companies for a variety of reasons, as they play a vital role in ensuring the quality, reliability, and success of software products.

These deliverables serve as tangible evidence of the thoroughness and effectiveness of the validation process, which is essential for meeting customer expectations, regulatory compliance, and achieving overall business goals. Here’s why validation deliverables are of utmost importance:

people using computers at work
Photo by Mikhail Nilov on
  1. Quality Assurance: Validation deliverables provide a structured and documented approach to testing and verifying software functionality. This helps identify and rectify defects, inconsistencies, and potential issues, contributing to the development of high-quality software that meets industry standards and user requirements.
  2. Customer Satisfaction: Validated software is more likely to function as intended, providing a positive user experience. By thoroughly testing and validating software, validation deliverables ensure that the end product aligns with user expectations and meets their needs, thereby enhancing customer satisfaction.
  3. Risk Mitigation: Rigorous testing and validation help identify and address potential risks, vulnerabilities, and defects early in the development process. By mitigating these risks, validation deliverables reduce the likelihood of software failures, security breaches, and negative user experiences.
  4. Regulatory Compliance: In regulated industries such as healthcare, finance, and aerospace, validation deliverables are essential for demonstrating compliance with industry-specific regulations and standards. Proper documentation of validation processes and outcomes is crucial for passing audits and meeting legal requirements.
  5. Effective Communication: Validation deliverables, including test plans, test cases, and test reports, facilitate clear and effective communication between development teams, quality assurance teams, stakeholders, and end-users. These documents provide a common reference point and ensure that everyone is aligned on the software’s functionality.
  6. Process Improvement: Validation deliverables contribute to the ongoing improvement of development and testing processes. By analyzing testing outcomes and issues, software companies can identify areas for improvement and implement corrective actions to enhance future software releases.
  7. Reliable Deployment: Validation deliverables provide the confidence needed to deploy software to production environments. They assure stakeholders that the software has undergone thorough testing and validation, reducing the risk of unexpected issues upon deployment.
  8. Long-Term Maintenance: Well-documented validation deliverables serve as a valuable resource for ongoing maintenance and updates. When software is updated or modified, validation documentation helps ensure that the changes do not negatively impact existing functionality.
  9. Business Reputation: Delivering validated and high-quality software enhances a company’s reputation for producing reliable and trustworthy products. This positive reputation can lead to increased customer loyalty, referrals, and business growth.

How do people find validation deliverables challenging in software companies?

My project 1 4

Here are some common challenges that people may encounter when dealing with validation deliverables:

  1. Changing Requirements: Software projects often experience changing or evolving requirements. Keeping validation deliverables aligned with shifting requirements can be challenging and may require frequent updates to documentation and testing procedures.
  2. Resource Constraints: Validation activities can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Limited budgets, personnel, and timeframes can hinder the thoroughness of validation processes and lead to shortcuts that compromise software quality.
  3. Lack of Clear Standards: In regulated industries, compliance with industry-specific standards and regulations is crucial. Navigating and interpreting complex standards can be challenging, leading to uncertainties about which validation deliverables are required and how to achieve compliance.
  4. Scope Management: Determining the scope of validation deliverables can be tricky, especially in larger projects with interconnected components. Deciding what needs validation, what can be excluded, and how to address dependencies requires careful consideration.
  5. Documentation Burden: Comprehensive documentation is essential for validation, but excessive documentation can become overwhelming. Striking the right balance between detailed documentation and efficiency can be a challenge.
  6. Integration Challenges: In software ecosystems where multiple components or systems interact, validating the integration points can be complex. Ensuring that all components work seamlessly together and meet the required standards can be demanding.
  7. Validation Tools and Infrastructure: Having the right tools and infrastructure to support validation activities is crucial. Challenges can arise if the necessary tools are unavailable or not properly configured to accommodate the validation process.
  8. Testing Complexity: Some software systems are intricate, making it difficult to create comprehensive test cases that cover all possible scenarios. Balancing thorough testing with practicality can be a challenge.
  9. Managing Change: When software updates or modifications are made, ensuring that validation deliverables remain accurate and up-to-date can be challenging. Failing to update deliverables after changes can lead to discrepancies and potential compliance issues.
  10. Communication and Collaboration: Effective communication and collaboration between different teams (development, quality assurance, regulatory, etc.) are crucial for successful validation. Challenges in communication can lead to misunderstandings, delays, and inconsistencies in validation deliverables.
  11. Training and Skill Gaps: Not all team members may be well-versed in validation practices or the specific requirements of regulated industries. Ensuring that team members have the necessary training and skills can be a hurdle.
  12. Maintaining Consistency: In larger organizations or projects, ensuring consistency across validation deliverables for different modules or teams can be challenging. Maintaining a standardized approach to validation can be demanding.
My project 1 5

Leave a Reply

Up ↑

Translate »